Kun Liang

Recent Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong performance by leveraging long-form Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, but uniformly applying overlong reasoning at inference time incurs substantial and often unnecessary computational cost. To address this, prior work explores various strategies to infer an appropriate reasoning budget from the input. However, such approaches are unreliable in the worst case, as estimating the minimal required reasoning effort is fundamentally difficult, and they implicitly fix the trade-off between reasoning cost and accuracy during training, limiting flexibility under varying deployment scenarios. Motivated by these limitations, we propose ORBIT, a controllable multi-budget reasoning framework with well-separated reasoning modes triggered by input. ORBIT employs multi-stage reinforcement learning to discover Pareto-optimal reasoning behaviors at each effort, followed by on-policy distillation to fuse these behaviors into a single unified model. Experiments show that ORBIT achieves (1) controllable reasoning behavior over multiple modes, (2) competitive reasoning density within each mode, and (3) integration of these frontier policies into a single unified student model while preserving clear mode separation and high per-mode performance.

On-policy distillation (OPD) transfers reasoning behavior by training a student on teacher feedback along student-generated trajectories, but standard full-rollout training ties every update to a costly completion and can over-allocate supervision to late positions with low marginal value for the current student. We revisit this assumption through the useful supervision horizon: student-induced rollouts can drift from teacher-preferred continuations, while aligned prefixes may already preserve the long-horizon OPD update direction. We propose ADWIN, an adaptive-window framework for OPD that treats rollout length as an online admissibility decision, training on short teacher-anchored prefixes while using delayed full-rollout probes to audit prefix–full alignment and adapt the next horizon with staleness control. Across math and code reasoning benchmarks in single-task, multi-task, and strong-to-weak settings, ADWIN improves the accuracy–compute trade-off over full-rollout OPD and prefix-based baselines, reducing end-to-end training cost by up to 4.1 times while achieving comparable or better accuracy.

Assigning credit to intermediate steps remains a central challenge in training Large Language Models (LLMs) on multi-step reasoning tasks with sparse terminal rewards, and actor-critic methods such as PPO address this by learning value functions to construct token-level advantages. Their effectiveness, however, hinges on reliable value estimation, a difficult task requiring the critic to both assess progress toward a correct solution and anticipate an evolving policy’s future behavior; errors in either can compromise credit assignment and destabilize online training. In this paper, we revisit the standard state-only formulation of value estimation and propose πPPO, a self-privileged actor-critic framework. By reusing verified same-prompt rollouts as contrastive evidence, πPPO helps the critic assess intermediate reasoning against successful and failed attempts, while preserving standard policy optimization and the deployment interface. Experiments show that πPPO consistently improves value-estimation quality by a substantial margin and outperforms representative actor-critic and critic-free RLVR baselines on challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks, while remaining effective even when paired with substantially smaller asymmetric critics.